<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Code Makes Money While You Sleep</title>
	<atom:link href="http://theoradical.net/2010/01/code-makes-money-while-you-sleep/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://theoradical.net/2010/01/code-makes-money-while-you-sleep/</link>
	<description>an obession with first principles</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 20 Jul 2010 13:46:00 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: jobelenus</title>
		<link>http://theoradical.net/2010/01/code-makes-money-while-you-sleep/comment-page-1/#comment-93</link>
		<dc:creator>jobelenus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Jan 2010 10:33:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theoradical.net/?p=664#comment-93</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t think softwareHouse extends consultingHouse.  I often believe Managers do think this, however.  &quot;If I just get enough clients to buy-in and we make enough money, we will finally have a product we can sell&quot;.  And sure from the marketing end you might have a bundle of things to wrap up and sell.  But from a software perspective it is in no way a true product.  I think the, often unspoken, aims of a consulting house are to make the sale and keep the revolving door of clients go.  While the aims of a software house are to solve a business problem once, and only once.  After all, code can be run a million times with zero cost.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;And, don&#039;t be confused these are two archetypes of software companies.  No company conforms perfectly to either.  Companies exhibit tendencies.  But when you&#039;re looking at symptoms/problems you are facing it is helpful to know where they might come from.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Good to hear from you Bibby! Your photo should be you on a beach!.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#39;t think softwareHouse extends consultingHouse.  I often believe Managers do think this, however.  &#8220;If I just get enough clients to buy-in and we make enough money, we will finally have a product we can sell&#8221;.  And sure from the marketing end you might have a bundle of things to wrap up and sell.  But from a software perspective it is in no way a true product.  I think the, often unspoken, aims of a consulting house are to make the sale and keep the revolving door of clients go.  While the aims of a software house are to solve a business problem once, and only once.  After all, code can be run a million times with zero cost.</p>
<p>And, don&#39;t be confused these are two archetypes of software companies.  No company conforms perfectly to either.  Companies exhibit tendencies.  But when you&#39;re looking at symptoms/problems you are facing it is helpful to know where they might come from.</p>
<p>Good to hear from you Bibby! Your photo should be you on a beach!.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jobelenus</title>
		<link>http://theoradical.net/2010/01/code-makes-money-while-you-sleep/comment-page-1/#comment-157</link>
		<dc:creator>jobelenus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Jan 2010 10:33:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theoradical.net/?p=664#comment-157</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t think softwareHouse extends consultingHouse.  I often believe Managers do think this, however.  &quot;If I just get enough clients to buy-in and we make enough money, we will finally have a product we can sell&quot;.  And sure from the marketing end you might have a bundle of things to wrap up and sell.  But from a software perspective it is in no way a true product.  I think the, often unspoken, aims of a consulting house are to make the sale and keep the revolving door of clients go.  While the aims of a software house are to solve a business problem once, and only once.  After all, code can be run a million times with zero cost.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;And, don&#039;t be confused these are two archetypes of software companies.  No company conforms perfectly to either.  Companies exhibit tendencies.  But when you&#039;re looking at symptoms/problems you are facing it is helpful to know where they might come from.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Good to hear from you Bibby! Your photo should be you on a beach!.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#39;t think softwareHouse extends consultingHouse.  I often believe Managers do think this, however.  &#8220;If I just get enough clients to buy-in and we make enough money, we will finally have a product we can sell&#8221;.  And sure from the marketing end you might have a bundle of things to wrap up and sell.  But from a software perspective it is in no way a true product.  I think the, often unspoken, aims of a consulting house are to make the sale and keep the revolving door of clients go.  While the aims of a software house are to solve a business problem once, and only once.  After all, code can be run a million times with zero cost.</p>
<p>And, don&#39;t be confused these are two archetypes of software companies.  No company conforms perfectly to either.  Companies exhibit tendencies.  But when you&#39;re looking at symptoms/problems you are facing it is helpful to know where they might come from.</p>
<p>Good to hear from you Bibby! Your photo should be you on a beach!.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bibby</title>
		<link>http://theoradical.net/2010/01/code-makes-money-while-you-sleep/comment-page-1/#comment-92</link>
		<dc:creator>bibby</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Jan 2010 02:01:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theoradical.net/?p=664#comment-92</guid>
		<description>Interesting, and hard to argue with. But does softwareHouse extend&lt;br&gt;consultingHouse? It sounds like the only difference between these two&lt;br&gt;entities is the fact that the software house writes the solution&lt;br&gt;themselves (versus subcontracting, I guess).&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I can&#039;t think of a &quot;consulting&quot; firm that&#039;s had any real influence on&lt;br&gt;code I&#039;ve written - it&#039;s all been spec&#039;d by the front of the house.&lt;br&gt;But I&#039;m compelled to agree that I think the real needs of the client&lt;br&gt;aren&#039;t always being uncovered. Sometimes the first thing a client&lt;br&gt;wants to do with their new product is hack it up to do the other&lt;br&gt;things on their wishlist that I wasn&#039;t aware of at the time.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;On the one-hand, it keeps me working, and that means money.&lt;br&gt;But I&#039;d much, MUCH rather make that money sleeping.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting, and hard to argue with. But does softwareHouse extend<br />consultingHouse? It sounds like the only difference between these two<br />entities is the fact that the software house writes the solution<br />themselves (versus subcontracting, I guess).</p>
<p>I can&#39;t think of a &#8220;consulting&#8221; firm that&#39;s had any real influence on<br />code I&#39;ve written &#8211; it&#39;s all been spec&#39;d by the front of the house.<br />But I&#39;m compelled to agree that I think the real needs of the client<br />aren&#39;t always being uncovered. Sometimes the first thing a client<br />wants to do with their new product is hack it up to do the other<br />things on their wishlist that I wasn&#39;t aware of at the time.</p>
<p>On the one-hand, it keeps me working, and that means money.<br />But I&#39;d much, MUCH rather make that money sleeping.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bibby</title>
		<link>http://theoradical.net/2010/01/code-makes-money-while-you-sleep/comment-page-1/#comment-156</link>
		<dc:creator>bibby</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Jan 2010 02:01:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theoradical.net/?p=664#comment-156</guid>
		<description>Interesting, and hard to argue with. But does softwareHouse extend&lt;br&gt;consultingHouse? It sounds like the only difference between these two&lt;br&gt;entities is the fact that the software house writes the solution&lt;br&gt;themselves (versus subcontracting, I guess).&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I can&#039;t think of a &quot;consulting&quot; firm that&#039;s had any real influence on&lt;br&gt;code I&#039;ve written - it&#039;s all been spec&#039;d by the front of the house.&lt;br&gt;But I&#039;m compelled to agree that I think the real needs of the client&lt;br&gt;aren&#039;t always being uncovered. Sometimes the first thing a client&lt;br&gt;wants to do with their new product is hack it up to do the other&lt;br&gt;things on their wishlist that I wasn&#039;t aware of at the time.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;On the one-hand, it keeps me working, and that means money.&lt;br&gt;But I&#039;d much, MUCH rather make that money sleeping.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting, and hard to argue with. But does softwareHouse extend<br />consultingHouse? It sounds like the only difference between these two<br />entities is the fact that the software house writes the solution<br />themselves (versus subcontracting, I guess).</p>
<p>I can&#39;t think of a &#8220;consulting&#8221; firm that&#39;s had any real influence on<br />code I&#39;ve written &#8211; it&#39;s all been spec&#39;d by the front of the house.<br />But I&#39;m compelled to agree that I think the real needs of the client<br />aren&#39;t always being uncovered. Sometimes the first thing a client<br />wants to do with their new product is hack it up to do the other<br />things on their wishlist that I wasn&#39;t aware of at the time.</p>
<p>On the one-hand, it keeps me working, and that means money.<br />But I&#39;d much, MUCH rather make that money sleeping.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
